#PRODUCT STRATEGY #PORTFOLIO STRATEGY #AI PORDUCT

Turning scattered customer signals into a system the roadmap actually used

Customer signal was everywhere at C&R — support tickets, sales calls, churn surveys — and influencing nothing. I designed an intake-to-roadmap pipeline that made every signal traceable from ticket to shipped feature, and the patterns it surfaced reinforced what we already suspected: trust, not competitors, was costing us the most.


COMPANY
Compliance and Risk


ROLE
Senior Manager, Experience & Market Insights

TIMELINE
2024–2026

THE SITUATION

Customer signal was everywhere — and influencing nothing

Customer signal existed all over the business — sales conversations, trial check-ins, churn surveys, support tickets — but it was scattered and inconsistent. Product, sales, and leadership were often making decisions without a shared view of what customers were actually saying or doing. Feedback came in, got read, and mostly went nowhere.


WHAT WE DID

Designed a traceable pipeline from signal to shipped feature

I designed an end-to-end workflow — Zendesk for intake, Jira Product Discovery for triage and prioritisation, Jira Software for delivery, with status updates flowing back to the customer automatically. A market research manager on my team operationalised it. Every request is typed (feature request vs. product feedback), triaged, linked to existing roadmap items as supporting evidence, and tracked through to delivery. Nothing gets lost, and any request can be traced end-to-end: ticket → idea → epic → shipped.

That pipeline produced a weekly Voice of User report — recurring themes mapped directly against roadmap commitments. When "need for one platform" kept surfacing, the roadmap comment wasn't vague: Product Compliance was confirmed for the December release. When workflow gaps kept coming up, that became the Action Centre, scoped for Q2.


"Every request traceable end-to-end: ticket → idea → epic → shipped"


Went deeper than tickets

The pipeline captured volume, but we needed depth too. Some requests came in as text — typed by users directly or logged by the team — but a lot of the richest signal was sitting in conversations. We used automated analysis of sales and customer call recordings, through Salesloft and Hey Marvin, to extract requests and insights at scale without anyone manually reviewing every call. On top of that, we ran roughly 200 qualitative customer interviews that shaped what got built for V1 and V2, and validated it after release. We mapped all of it against jobs-to-be-done to identify where the real roadmap opportunities were, rather than just responding to the loudest request.

Closed the loop with sales

I built a sales enablement deck that translated the new product vision into language the sales team could actually use with prospects, and trained the team on it.

Partnered on the closed-loss analysis

Working with sales and competitive intelligence, I dug into a large set of closed-lost deals to understand why we were actually losing — not the reason logged in the CRM, but the real driver underneath it.

The pattern that came out was consistent with what the VOU pipeline and interviews were already telling us: the single biggest loss driver wasn't competitors, it was status quo inertia — buyers who acknowledged the value but never found enough urgency to act.

The second most common driver was a coverage and content credibility gap — buyers who didn't trust we covered their specific product category well enough to switch. That gave the team a shared framework for qualifying deals earlier, rather than discovering the real objection only after months of stalled engagement.


IMPACT

90% voluntary migration in three months — proof the experience actually worked

  • 90% of customers voluntarily migrated to the new experience within three months of GA — a credible adoption signal precisely because no one was forced

  • Caught and corrected two years of unvalidated design decisions before they shipped broadly to a workflow with 110k MAU and a direct renewal correlation

  • Avoided forcing a disruptive migration onto exactly the power users most sensitive to added friction


WHAT THIS TAUGHT ME

The risk in inherited work isn't always visible in the work itself — it's in what was never tested. Two years of design effort can still ship broken if no one checked it against how people actually use the product day to day.

Letting users opt in is itself a confidence signal.